• UK: New AI Growth Zone confirmed in North Wales. The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) announced that North Wales will host a new AI Growth Zone expected to create more than 3,400 jobs and help unlock up to £100 billion of investment in AI-enabled data-centre infrastructure and related industries. GOV.UK press release

  • UK: AI Growth Zones collection relaunched. DSIT published a refreshed AI Growth Zones collection, framing the programme as a core instrument for “unlock[ing] investment in AI-enabled data centres” by improving access to power and providing planning support, with AI explicitly positioned as critical national infrastructure. GOV.UK

Regulation

  • UK: Policy paper on “Delivering AI Growth Zones”. DSIT issued a policy paper setting out a package of reforms to support AI data centres through AI Growth Zones, including: (i) creation of an AI Growth Zone Delivery Unit as a single point of contact for investors and developers; (ii) mechanisms to “reallocate” and reserve grid capacity in favour of strategic AI sites; and (iii) exploration of co-financing via the National Wealth Fund and UK Export Finance. This effectively treats AI data-centre build-out and associated planning and energy rules as a targeted regulatory regime for AI infrastructure. GOV.UK

Cases

  • Germany/EU: GEMA v OpenAI – song-lyrics training held infringing. A Munich regional court has ruled that training ChatGPT on GEMA-represented song lyrics without permission infringed German copyright law, ordering OpenAI to pay damages or licence fees. The court rejected arguments that only users are responsible for outputs, treating the use of lyrics as training data itself as a relevant reproduction, with potential implications for text-and-data-mining exceptions and future AI-training litigation across the EU. Reuters, Guardian

  • US: Discovery and privacy pressure in AI litigation. In ongoing US proceedings, OpenAI is contesting a court order to produce millions of ChatGPT conversation logs, arguing the request is overbroad and raises confidentiality concerns; in a separate class action, Google is accused of using its Gemini AI to “access and exploit” users’ Gmail content by default, allegedly breaching privacy expectations. Both disputes underscore that evidentiary and data-governance duties for AI providers are becoming central battlegrounds, beyond IP alone. Reuters report on OpenAI discovery dispute, coverage of Gemini Gmail suit

Academia

  • “The Political Economy and Geopolitics of AI Regulation” . Jacobides, Gawer, Lang and Zuluaga Martinez argue that AI regulation has become a strategic “battleground” and distinguish between “supplier” states that host frontier model developers and “adopter” states that focus on downstream use. They diagnose three failures – “regulatory drift”, “litigation-led rule-making” and “ecosystem lock-in” – and propose layered, sector-embedded governance separating oversight of models, deployments and systems. For AIJurium, this provides a helpful analytical frame to situate the UK’s flexible, infrastructure-focused approach and the EU’s more comprehensive AI Act in a wider political-economy context.  SSRN

Business

  • Impact of AI Growth Zones on AI infrastructure and markets. The AI Growth Zones package seeks to de-risk investment in large-scale compute and data centres by prioritising grid capacity, streamlining planning, and signalling potential public co-investment. This will shape where frontier-model and data-intensive AI businesses locate in the UK, with implications for regional labour markets, local planning obligations, and energy-system governance. 

  • Litigation risk as a business cost for AI providers. The Getty–Stability AI and GEMA–OpenAI decisions, plus US discovery and privacy disputes, illustrate that copyright, data-protection and civil-procedure risks are no longer peripheral but core to business models for foundation-model providers. Firms operating in the UK and EU will need to stress-test training-data sources, logging and retention policies, and transparency strategies against divergent national interpretations of reproduction, text-and-data-mining exceptions, and disclosure obligations. 

Adoption of AI

  • Measuring AI’s economic and social footprint. The latest ONS “Economic activity and social change in the UK, real-time indicators” bulletin, released today, again highlights big-data indicators and references related outputs on public attitudes to artificial intelligence. It shows AI is being treated as a structural factor in official monitoring of business conditions and social trends, not just as a niche technology topic. ONS bulletin (13 Nov 2025)

  • Public-sector AI and local communications. The Local Government Association is running an “Artificial Intelligence in Local Government Communications” event in London today, aimed at helping councils integrate AI tools into engagement and communications while managing reputational and ethical risks. This reflects growing operational adoption of AI at local-government level, beyond central government pilots. LGA event listing.

Events

  • UK: Artificial Intelligence in Local Government Communications (LGA). One-day event in London focused on how councils can use AI tools in communications and engagement while remaining compliant with legal and ethical standards. LGA event listing.

  • EU: DigitalEU at Web Summit 2025 (Lisbon, 10–13 Nov). The European Commission’s digital directorate is participating in Web Summit 2025 with sessions on AI, data and platform regulation, emphasising opportunities for startups operating under the EU’s evolving AI and digital-market framework. DigitalEU/Web Summit 2025

Takeaway

Today’s picture combines infrastructure and litigation: the UK is moving ahead with AI Growth Zones as a bespoke framework for data-centre-heavy AI development, while European and US courts are sharpening constraints around training data, privacy and discovery. For AI actors operating in or trading with the UK, EU and US, compliance strategy now has to integrate infrastructure siting, IP risk, data governance and disclosure obligations as a single, interdependent package rather than separate tracks.

Sources: GOV.UK, DSIT, UK Parliament, Local Government Association, Office for National Statistics, Reuters, The Guardian, Insurancejournal, SSRN, Websummit